“CATCH aims to ensure that people in trachoma-endemic areas benefit from eye care services”
We know that a coordinated approach to eye health and neglected tropical diseases, at the community level, is the right thing to do. But how do we go about it?
That’s what the CATCH (coordinated approach to community health) programme is leading the way on. The basic mandate of CATCH is to ensure that people in the trachoma-endemic areas of Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Uganda and Zambia benefit from improved health through the provision of eye care services. One major activity of the project is coordination with the trachomatous trichiasis (TT) surgery camps, taking care of the people who turn up at the camp but have something other than TT by giving other care on site or facilitating trips for cataract surgery and other issues.
But that’s not all: CATCH is supposed to support cataract operations, bacterial conjunctivitis, capacity building of human resource for eye health, operational research, advocacy and strengthening of health systems for eye health to ensure improved eye health services are available in the future.
CATCH’s larger mandate actually links directly to trachoma elimination and will play a crucial role in the surveillance phase. When TT surgery camps end in a country, ensuring that trained field technicians are available to identify and manage eye health problems, including unmanaged TT cases, is increasingly a challenge. But it is also a necessary step, along with presenting evidence that the prevalence of unmanaged trichiasis is below the elimination threshold, to gain elimination status. So programmes like CATCH can clearly help. Let’s see what they’ve learned so far.
What we’ve learned from CATCH
Early communication on programme design is key.
Concerns were raised post-design about CATCH’s potential negative impact on the performance of TT camps. Would CATCH create longer camp times and thus increase the TT surgery vs time spent ratio, or have challenges budgeting at the camp level and increase the costs to run a TT camp? There was never a dispute over whether CATCH was the right approach – that was clear. But the reality is that performance indicators, budgets and implementation plans need to be aligned early on.
Don’t underestimate the logistics and costs.
Coordinating shared vehicles and staff, social mobilisation, tracking referred patients, organising transport and care, reporting for both the project and the MoH – all in limited human resource areas – requires more management and oversight then some other, less complex, programmes do. Budget and hire accordingly!
Positive word of mouth is essential.
Word of mouth really does make or break a programme. CATCH’s advice:
- Make sure visual outcomes are good – obviously the best advertisement for services.
- Provide comprehensive eye health on site where possible – treating of bacterial conjunctivitis and distribution of near vision glasses during the camp spreads the message that turning up at the camp is worthwhile.
- Always counsel post-surgery – knowledge on drug compliance and appropriate follow-up helps avoid negative experiences.
Small changes in process can be huge.
Once we start looking at coordinated approaches we have the tendency to want to reinvent the entire health system. Of course that’s not possible – but small steps can also be powerful. For example, in all of the CATCH countries visual outcome monitoring across the 14 key facilities was non-existent when the project started. Those facilities are now using World Health Organisation cataract outcome monitoring, which means that surgeries and follow-ups can be tracked and that surgeons and facilities can now see their performance over time and understand where they need to improve.
Real focus on training, not just equipment.
Part of building local capacity is providing the right equipment; CATCH also provides specialised training on how to use the complicated and high-value equipment in each country. But maintenance has been a real issue, and in some cases even use of the equipment has been a challenge despite training – though most ophthalmic personnel don’t want to admit that. CATCH suggests more communication with ophthalmic personnel early on, as well as frequent knowledge tests so training can be individually customised.
There are still mysteries.
It’s okay to admit that we don’t know everything. CATCH was designed to counter the largest known barriers to access, but even when travel, meals and lodging are offered to patients, many of them they still don’t show up to be taken in for care. Is it fear of surgery, misinformation, or distrust in the system? How can we counter these issues? The team is working now on operational research across all five countries to understand this – and help guide the next chapter in coordinated approaches to eye health.
By Sarah Bartlett, Sightsavers’ mHealth adviser for NTDs
Want to read more about our work?
Neglected tropical diseases
Is data integration the answer to eliminating trachoma in Ethiopia?
Biruck Kebede, who leads Sightsavers’ NTD work in Ethiopia, explains how data can help to eliminate diseases such as trachoma.
How does the UN disability committee election work?
An important election is taking place later in November that will have huge implications for the rights of people with disabilities across the world.
“Gender and background make a huge difference in how we experience disability”
It is important to ensure gender balance and equity to ensure that women have the right to a voice.
